We performed salah behind someone who ridiculed our Imam. Do we need to repeat our Salah?

by Mufti Faisal
5 minutes read

Question:

Sheikh, We have been brought up with teaching that Imam is our leader, who takes burden of our prayers in court of Allah. So respect for the Imam has always been cornerstone of my Iman. We are in a small musallah where we have a designated Imam. Elhamdulilleh he is a good Imam. Sometime he is a few minutes late here and there, but we have never seen him disrespect any one or shout or anything. Most of our masjid wait for imam so we can pray together and he always appreciates this.

I was very shocked the other day when our masjid administrator attended the zuhr and Imam was 2-4 minutes late. The admin stood up and performed Imamat. After salah, admin took the imam to back room and we could hear him scolding the Imam.

As a regular person I did not intervene, but my heart is shattered. How can the admin, who is just a servant of community disrespect our Imam. The admin does not even come regularly. I cannot respect him just because he has money and fancy car. He shouted at my Imam. My heart is broken having witnessed this. I feel my zuhr salah is not valid behind the admin. Should I repeat it?

Answer:

Bismillฤhi Taสฟฤlฤ

Assalฤmu สฟalaykum warahฬฃmatullฤhฤซ wabrakฤtuh,

At the outset, we admire and appreciate your love and respect for the Shiสฟฤr of Islฤm. It is indeed a sign of ฤชmฤn. We would also point out before anything else, that the Imฤm in question is incorrect in his punctuality. We live in a time where-in punctuality drives regular life. A congregation is expected to be completed by a certain time so that the congregants can return to their regular life, work and appointments. Hence, the Imฤm should definitely work on his punctuality and keep the comfort of people in mind.

What is interesting to note is that the congregants do not seem to mind an occasional delay from the Imฤm while the organizer has an issue with it. To understand the sharสฟฤซ boundaries for this interaction, it should be kept in mind that the Imฤm has entered into a contract to make himself available for the specific times. His wagers are in lieu of the time and not some particular worship(s). This entails that being late for presenting himself for his job is indeed an infractionable offense. The Imฤm should know this and should make sure that he is present a few minutes prior to the congregation. If a review of his absenteeism, purely from the contractual stance is taken and he is penalized or terminated for continuous disregard for the punctuality, it will not be against sharฤซสฟah.

Having said that, we also take note that the congregants do not have any problem with him. So, should for some reason a designated Imฤm is delayed, then sharสฟan it is still the Imฤmโ€™s right to lead the congregation. สฟAllฤma al-Hฬฃaskafฤซ rahฬฃimahullah has mentioned,

โ€œโ€ฆ(and) know that (owner of the house) and the like and the designated Imฤm of the masjid (is more worthy to lead the salฤh than anyone else) generally… โ€[1]

สฟAllamah ibn al-Abidฤซn rahฬฃimahullah explains further that โ€œโ€ฆeven though there may be a more knowledgeable, and better recited within the congregationโ€ฆโ€ [2]

When termination of an Imฤm is concerned, despite in our contemporary construct of the contractual agreement, even when the Imฤm is transgressive in religion, it may still be disliked terminating him from position, lest it creates further discord and fitna in community. In such a case, it is much more acceptable that he be given due course of counseling to help him reform from his lapses. [3]

Then, the issue arrives at the trusteeโ€™s handling of the situation. The action of the trustee does not only belittle the entire field of wisdom, but also shows that the individual has no clue how to handle crisis in a worship place. Masฤjid are places where the faith of congregants is cultivated and nurtured. At its core, Imฤm forms the source for this nurturing. To disrespect, ridicule and belittle the Imฤm in the way described in the question is unquestionably un-islamic, worthy of rebuke and reprimand.

No individual deserves to be ridiculed in this manner, let alone an Imฤm of a Masjid in presence of his congregants. Rectification requires precision, forbearance and wisdom. The trustee shows lack of all these qualities. Such individuals are inept for the position of administration they flaunt at every chance they find. Alas, it is starting to feel like a recurring pandemic in our communities wherein religious leaders, regardless of their stature and astuteness in dฤซn, are subjected to such ignorant trustees who treat masฤjid and like their property. The trustee is equally, if not more, deserving of rectification and isฬฃlฤhฬฃ and some senior should speak to him and rectify his incorrect actions so he does not transgress in future as he has done here.

Finally, your concern is with regards to the dhuhr salฤh which was led by this trustee. The trustee, while transgressor in his actions and character, is still a Muslim. Salฤh behind him, although Makrลซh, is still valid. You do not need to repeat it. [4]

And Allฤh Taสฟฤlฤ Knows best,

Wassalamu สฟalaykum,

Mufti Faisal al-Mahmudi

[1]

ุงู„ุฏุฑ ุงู„ู…ุฎุชุงุฑ ูˆุญุงุดูŠุฉ ุงุจู† ุนุงุจุฏูŠู† (ุฑุฏ ุงู„ู…ุญุชุงุฑ) (1/ 559)
(ูˆ) ุงุนู„ู… ุฃู† (ุตุงุญุจ ุงู„ุจูŠุช) ูˆู…ุซู„ู‡ ุฅู…ุงู… ุงู„ู…ุณุฌุฏ ุงู„ุฑุงุชุจ (ุฃูˆู„ู‰ ุจุงู„ุฅู…ุงู…ุฉ ู…ู† ุบูŠุฑู‡) ู…ุทู„ู‚ุง

[2]

ุญุงุดูŠุฉ ุงุจู† ุนุงุจุฏูŠู† (ุฑุฏ ุงู„ู…ุญุชุงุฑ) (1/ 559)
(ู‚ูˆู„ู‡ ู…ุทู„ู‚ุง) ุฃูŠ ูˆุฅู† ูƒุงู† ุบูŠุฑู‡ ู…ู† ุงู„ุญุงุถุฑูŠู† ู…ู† ู‡ูˆ ุฃุนู„ู… ูˆุฃู‚ุฑุฃ ู…ู†ู‡. ูˆููŠ ุงู„ุชุชุงุฑุฎุงู†ูŠุฉ: ุฌู…ุงุนุฉ ุฃุถูŠุงู ููŠ ุฏุงุฑ ู†ุฑูŠุฏ ุฃู† ูŠุชู‚ุฏู… ุฃุญุฏู‡ู… ูŠู†ุจุบูŠ ุฃู† ูŠุชู‚ุฏู… ุงู„ู…ุงู„ูƒุŒ ูุฅู† ู‚ุฏู… ูˆุงุญุฏุง ู…ู†ู‡ู… ู„ุนู„ู…ู‡ ูˆูƒุจุฑู‡ ูู‡ูˆ ุฃูุถู„ุŒ ูˆุฅุฐุง ุชู‚ุฏู… ุฃุญุฏู‡ู… ุฌุงุฒ ู„ุฃู† ุงู„ุธุงู‡ุฑ ุฃู† ุงู„ู…ุงู„ูƒ ูŠุฃุฐู† ู„ุถูŠูู‡ ุฅูƒุฑุงู…ุง ู„ู‡. ุงู‡ู€.

[3]

ุงู„ุฏุฑ ุงู„ู…ุฎุชุงุฑ ูˆุญุงุดูŠุฉ ุงุจู† ุนุงุจุฏูŠู† (ุฑุฏ ุงู„ู…ุญุชุงุฑ) (1/ 549)
((ูˆูŠูƒุฑู‡ ุชู‚ู„ูŠุฏ ุงู„ูุงุณู‚ ูˆูŠุนุฒู„ ุจู‡ ุฅู„ุง ู„ูุชู†ุฉ. ูˆูŠุฌุจ ุฃู† ูŠุฏุนู‰ ู„ู‡ ุจุงู„ุตู„ุงุญ)) ย ุฃูŠ ุจุงู„ูุณู‚ ู„ูˆ ุทุฑุฃ ุนู„ูŠู‡… ูˆุนู†ุฏ ุงู„ุญู†ููŠุฉ ู„ูŠุณุช ุงู„ุนุฏุงู„ุฉ ุดุฑุทุง ู„ู„ุตุญุฉ ููŠุตุญ ุชู‚ู„ูŠุฏ ุงู„ูุงุณู‚ ุงู„ุฅู…ุงู…ุฉ ู…ุน ุงู„ูƒุฑุงู‡ุฉุ› ูˆุฅุฐุง ู‚ู„ุฏ ุนุฏู„ุง ุซู… ุฌุงุฑ ูˆูุณู‚ ู„ุง ูŠู†ุนุฒู„ุ› ูˆู„ูƒู† ูŠุณุชุญุจ ุงู„ุนุฒู„ ุฅู† ู„ู… ูŠุณุชู„ุฒู… ูุชู†ุฉ

[4]

ุงู„ุงุฎุชูŠุงุฑ ู„ุชุนู„ูŠู„ ุงู„ู…ุฎุชุงุฑ (1/ 58)
ูˆูŠูƒุฑู‡ ุฅู…ุงู…ุฉ ุงู„ุนุจุฏ (ู) ูˆุงู„ุฃุนุฑุงุจูŠ ูˆุงู„ุฃุนู…ู‰ (ู) ูˆุงู„ูุงุณู‚

ุจุฏุงุฆุน ุงู„ุตู†ุงุฆุน ููŠ ุชุฑุชูŠุจ ุงู„ุดุฑุงุฆุน (1/ 156)
(ูˆู„ู†ุง) ู…ุง ุฑูˆูŠ ุนู† ุงู„ู†ุจูŠ – ุตู„ู‰ ุงู„ู„ู‡ ุนู„ูŠู‡ ูˆุณู„ู… – ุฃู†ู‡ ู‚ุงู„: ยซุตู„ูˆุง ุฎู„ู ู…ู† ู‚ุงู„ ู„ุง ุฅู„ู‡ ุฅู„ุง ุงู„ู„ู‡ยป ุŒ ูˆู‚ูˆู„ู‡ – ุตู„ู‰ ุงู„ู„ู‡ ุนู„ูŠู‡ ูˆุณู„ู… – ยซุตู„ูˆุง ุฎู„ู ูƒู„ ุจุฑ ูˆูุงุฌุฑยป

Related Posts

Focus Mode